In Flat Demand and More Law Schools,I suggested that new law schools were more likely to compete with U.S. NewsTier 3 and Tier 4 schools (especially the latter). To illustrate that, lets look at the 27 schools accredited after 1988. Only two of the schools (Seattle and UNLV) were ranked in Tier 2, and only three of the schools (Chapman, Florida International and Quinnipiac) were ranked in Tier 3. The remaining schools were ranked in Tier 4 (10 Schools) or were not rated by U.S. News (12 schools).

The chart shows the distribution of the LSAT 25th percentiles for the Fall 2008 entering classes, as shown in the 2010 Official Guide. The 25th percentile for all ABA-approved law schools (other than the three in Puerto Rico) was 151. Over 74% of the post-1988 law schools (19 out of 27) had entering classes with an LSAT 25th percentile of 151 or lower.
To be sure, UC-Irvine will be a much stronger law school. Perhaps U. North Texas in Dallas will also do well. Bothhave a lot of money being put into them, which is always good. But UNT-Dallas is bound to hurt Texas Wesleyan in the other half of the Dallas- Ft. Worth metroplex.
Gary Rosin

GPAs and Standardized Test Abuse
Friday, October 23rd, 2009An article by Scott Jaschik, More Testing, Less Logic? (Inside Higher Ed) comments on an article by Anne VanderMey, GMAT: The MBA Job Seeker’s Best Friend (Business Week). VanderMey reports on a disturbing trend in the MBA job market:
According to both VanderMey and Jaschik, some schools are advising students to retake the GMAT.
VanderMey observes that while employers looking for people to do “heavy quantitative lifting” find the quantitative portion of the GMAT useful, the real problem is that GPAs are not always useful:
The problem with GPAs is that they are not objective measures of performance. Rather, they just sort each cohort of admitted students. The strength B-school cohorts vary from school to school, and even from year to year.
Jaschik suggests that the problem is more acute at lower-ranked B-schools:
Jaschik’s main focus is on the use of GMAT scores for purposes other than as a guide to first-year MBA grades. He argues that testing companies, such as the GMAC (presumably, the Graduate Management Admissions Council), should more actively resist the use of test scores for purposes other than admission.
U.S. News uses LSAT scores of entering classes as one of the factors in its rankings of law schools. The LSAC and the ABA also report the LSAT profiles of entering classes in their annual Office Guide to ABA-Approved Law Schools. Of course, they also provide a wealth of additional data about each law school.
Has anyone heard of law firms and other employers of lawyers using LSAT scores in evaluating job applicants?
posted by Gary Rosin
Posted in Commentary, LSAT, Law Schools, Rankings | No Comments »