Peer Assessments and the Great Divide

Earlier this year, Paul Caron listed the peer assessment scores from the 2010 US News law school rankings. The rating scale runs from 1 (highest) to 5 (lowest). Here’s how the numbers fell out:

Average: 2.55

Percentiles
     25th between 1.9 (22nd) and 2.0 (30th)
     50th between 2.3 (47th) & 2.4 (55th)
     75th about 2.9

The distribution (with a normal reference curve) looks like this:

Distribution of 2010 US News Peer Asessments

Looking at the actual scores, the distribution is decidedly non-normal.  Of particular interest are the “fat tails”–the distributions of the top and bottom 25 percent, which are much larger than would be expected with a normal distribution.  The top 75% of law schools have peer assessments have a range of 1.5 points (1.4 to 1.9), while the for bottom 25%, peer assessments have a slightly larger range, 1.7 points (from 3.1 to 4.8).

Tags: , ,

One Response to “Peer Assessments and the Great Divide”

  1. […] not sure that professors at top law schools really care about what happens on the other side of the Great Divide in the legal academy (Tiers 3 and 4).  If nothing else, the concerns of the lower-ranked schools […]

Leave a Reply